Military Relocation
Tami Price
6 min read Last reviewed September 19, 2026.
A three-year assignment can justify a purchase if the exit is planned before the home is bought: compare the likely payment with the likely rent, budget the selling costs, and confirm the numbers still work if the timeline holds. The decision belongs to a full comparison run both ways, not to the purchase math alone.
A three-year assignment is long enough to make buying tempting and short enough to make the exit matter. The sound approach is to plan the sale or rental before the purchase: compare the likely payment with the likely rent, budget the selling costs, and decide whether the numbers still work if the timeline holds.
The first column is the full cost of owning: principal, interest, taxes, insurance, and a realistic allowance for maintenance. The second column is the rent for an equivalent home in the same area. The gap between them, positive or negative, is the cost of owning each month.
These are estimates, not guarantees. Payments change with rates, taxes change with assessments, and rent changes with the market. The point of the comparison is direction: how much does ownership cost per month over what renting would?
Selling costs money: agent commissions, title and closing costs, repairs, and often seller concessions to the buyer. As a rule of thumb for planning only, selling costs in many Texas markets often run in the mid-single digits as a percentage of the sale price, though the actual figure depends on the specific terms of the sale.
For example, on a $300,000 sale, a 6 percent combined estimate would be about $18,000 before any repairs or concessions. That kind of number belongs in the upfront comparison, because the exit costs have to be recovered by appreciation or principal paydown for the purchase to break even on a short timeline.
Holding can make sense when the monthly ownership cost is close to or below local rent, when the home is expected to appreciate enough to cover the exit costs, or when the plan is to keep the home as a rental after the PCS rather than sell. Each condition has to be stated as a question, not an assumption.
The other holder-friendly case is stability: a fixed-rate mortgage payment that does not inflate over the tour, against rent that can. That stability has value, even when the rent-versus-own gap is small.
Buying becomes harder to justify on a short timeline when the monthly gap is large, when the market is flat enough that appreciation cannot recover selling costs, or when the household would need to sell at a fixed date regardless of conditions. A forced sale on a deadline is the most expensive kind.
The honest version of the decision requires looking at the current data for the actual area: recent sale prices, days on market, and how long sellers are waiting. That is the difference between a plan and a guess.
For a military buyer weighing a three-year tour, Tami Price puts the purchase and the exit on the same page: payment versus rent, estimated selling costs, and the rental option if the home would be kept. Her Air Force background means the PCS timeline is treated as a real constraint rather than an afterthought.
The scenarios in this article are estimates for planning, not promises. A lender quotes the payment; Tami sources the rent comparables and the selling-cost ranges for the specific home. That is how the decision actually gets made.
A three-year assignment can justify a purchase when the exit is planned before the home is bought: the likely payment compared with the likely rent, the selling costs, and a realistic break-even. If the numbers still work when the timeline holds, buying can make sense.
The ownership column is principal, interest, taxes, insurance, and a realistic allowance for maintenance, and the rent column is the rent for an equivalent home in the same area. Selling costs, often in the mid-single digits as a percentage of the sale price in many Texas markets, belong in the upfront comparison as well.
A forced sale on a deadline is the most expensive kind, because the seller has to accept whatever the market offers at that date. That is why the exit costs and timeline should be budgeted before the purchase, and why the rental option belongs in the comparison.
Keeping the home can make sense when the monthly ownership cost is close to or below local rent, when the home is expected to appreciate enough to cover the exit costs, or when the plan is to hold it as a rental after the PCS rather than sell. Each condition has to be checked against current data rather than assumed.
Have a question about your situation?
Every move is different. Tell Tami where you are in the process and she will give you a direct answer based on the current market.
Military procedures, VA financing, and market data change over time. These are the current references for the details in this article:
About the author
Tami Price
Tami Price is a U.S. Air Force veteran, Military Relocation Professional, and Broker Owner of Tami Price Properties. She has two decades of San Antonio real estate experience, more than 1,000 completed transactions, more than $270 million in career sales, and approximately 50 transactions a year, with a focus on military relocation around Joint Base San Antonio.
More about Tami
Tami Price is a U.S. Air Force veteran and Broker Owner of Tami Price Properties, helping military families across San Antonio and Joint Base San Antonio.
More about Tami